Acute Intraoperative Tympanic Membrane Rupture in Patient Anesthetized With Desflurane Without Nitrous Oxide: A Case Report.

We report a case of acute intraoperative tympanic membrane (TM) rupture in a patient anesthetized with desflurane without N2O. The patient was undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to treat ascending cholangitis. TM rupture is known to occur with N2O but has not been reported in the literature with the use of inhaled volatile anesthetics without N2O. We suspect that several factors contributed to this complication, including prone positioning, a remote history of ear trauma, and the selection of desflurane as the maintenance anesthetic as opposed to a vapor with a higher blood-gas partition coefficient.

Impact of prognostic nutritional index change on prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The alteration of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) or the utilization of distinct anesthesia strategies has been linked to the prognosis of various cancer types, but the existing evidence is limited and inconclusive, particularly for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our objective was to evaluate the association between PNI change and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with CRC surgery after propofol-based or sevoflurane-based anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 414 patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection. Among them, 165 patients received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA-P), while 249 patients received sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia (IA-S). The PNI change (ΔPNI) was calculated by subtracting the pre-surgery PNI from the post-surgery PNI, and patients were categorized into high (≥ -2.25) and low (< -2.25) ΔPNI groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to evaluate the effects of the two anesthesia methods, ΔPNI, and their potential interaction on PFS and OS. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 35.9 months (interquartile range: 18-60 months). The five-year OS rates were 63.0% in the TIVA-P group and 59.8% in the IA-S group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.35; p = 0.864), while the five-year PFS rates were 55.8% and 51.0% (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.68-1.26; p = 0.614), respectively. In comparison to patients in the low ΔPNI group, those in the high ΔPNI group exhibited a favorable association with both OS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.76; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43-0.79; p < 0.001). Stratified analysis based on ΔPNI revealed significant protective effects in the propofol-treated participants within the high ΔPNI group, whereas such effects were not observed in the low ΔPNI group, for both OS (p for interaction = 0.004) and PFS (p for interaction = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that among patients who underwent CRC surgery, those treated with TIVA-P exhibited superior survival outcomes compared to those who received IA-S, particularly among individuals with a high degree of PNI change.

Impact of total intravenous anesthesia and total inhalation anesthesia as the anesthesia maintenance approaches on blood glucose level and postoperative complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent metabolic disease in the world. Previous studies have shown that anesthetics can affect perioperative blood glucose levels which related to adverse clinical outcomes. Few studies have explored the choice of general anesthetic protocol on perioperative glucose metabolism in diabetes patients. We aimed to compare total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with total inhalation anesthesia (TIHA) on blood glucose level and complications in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing general surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind controlled trial, 116 type 2 diabetic patients scheduled for general surgery were randomly assigned to either the TIVA group or TIHA group (n = 56 and n = 60, respectively). The blood glucose level at different time points were measured and analyzed by the repeated-measures analysis of variance. The serum insulin and cortisol levels were measured and analyzed with t-test. The incidence of complications was followed up and analyzed with chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The risk factors for complications were analyzed using the logistic stepwise regression. RESULTS: The blood glucose levels were higher in TIHA group than that in TIVA group at the time points of extubation, 1 and 2 h after the operation, 1 and 2 days after the operation, and were significantly higher at 1 day after the operation (10.4 ± 2.8 vs. 8.1 ± 2.1 mmol/L; P < 0.01). The postoperative insulin level was higher in TIVA group than that in TIHA group (8.9 ± 2.9 vs. 7.6 ± 2.4 IU/mL; P = 0.011). The postoperative cortisol level was higher in TIHA group than that in TIVA group (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 12.2 ± 8.9 ug/dL ; P = 0.031). No significant difference regarding the incidence of complications between the two groups was found based on the current samples. Blood glucose level on postoperative day 1 was a risk factor for postoperative complications (OR: 1.779, 95%CI: 1.009 ~ 3.138). CONCLUSIONS: TIVA has less impact on perioperative blood glucose level and a better inhibition of cortisol release in type 2 diabetic patients compared to TIHA. A future large trial may be conducted to find the difference of complications between the two groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol registered on the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry on 20/01/2020 (ChiCTR2000029247).

Effects of Total Intravenous Versus Inhalational Anesthesia on Bleeding During Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Preliminary Results From a Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the type of maintenance anesthesia on the bleeding conditions of the surgical field and hemodynamic parameters during endoscopic ear surgery (EES), comparing totally intravenous inhalational anesthesia (TIVA) with inhalational anesthesia (IA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifteen consecutive EES cases performed with TIVA between 2019 and 2020 at our Institution were matched to a control group of patients who underwent EES with IA in the same period. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists IV grade, acute otitis before surgery, congenital or acquired coagulopathies, use of anti-inflammatory drugs, or antiaggregant or anticoagulant therapy in the 5 days before the intervention were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Both primary and revision tympanoplasty and stapes surgery were considered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical videos were reviewed to quantify the entity of bleeding according to the Modena Bleeding Score. Hemodynamic parameters during surgery were retrospectively collected. A comparison between the two groups was performed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of bleeding were found at any of time point evaluated. The tympanomeatal flap elevation resulted in the bloodiest step in both groups. Hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data do not support a significant difference in bleeding conditions and hemodynamic parameters between EES patients receiving TIVA and those receiving IA. Further studies involving a higher number of patients will improve our understanding on how maintenance anesthesia with TIVA may be beneficial in terms of bleeding control as compared with IA for patients undergoing EES.

Alfaxalone anaesthesia increases brain derived neurotrophic factor levels and preserves postoperative cognition by activating pregnane-X receptors: an in vitro study and a double blind randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alfaxalone is a fast acting intravenous anaesthetic with high therapeutic index. It is an analogue of the naturally-occurring neurosteroid allopregnanolone responsible for maintenance of cognition and neuroprotection by activation of brain pregnane X receptors and consequent increased production of mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (m-BDNF). Two studies are reported here: an in vitro study investigated whether alfaxalone activates human pregnane X receptors (h-PXR) as effectively as allopregnanolone; and a clinical study that measured postoperative changes in serum m-BDNF and cognition in patients after alfaxalone anaesthesia compared with propofol and sevoflurane. METHODS: In vitro Activation of h-PXR by allopregnanolone and alfaxalone solutions (206 - 50,000 nM) was measured using human embryonic kidney cells expressing h-PXR hybridised and linked to the firefly luciferase gene. Light emission by luciferase stimulated by each ligand binding with h-PXR was measured. Clinical A double blind prospective randomised study of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty anaesthetised with alfaxalone TIVA (n = 8) or propofol TIVA (n = 3) or propofol plus sevoflurane inhalational anaesthesia (n = 4). The doses of anaesthetics were titrated to the same depth of anaesthesia (BIS 40-60). Subjects' cognitive performance was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Mini Mental State examination (MMSE) for 7 days postoperatively. Serum m-BDNF concentrations were measured for 7 postoperative days. RESULTS: In vitro Allopregnanolone and alfaxalone both activated h-PXR, alfaxalone being more efficacious than allopregnanolone: 50,000 nM, p = 0.0019; 16,700 nM, p = 0.0472; 5600 nM, p = 0.0031. Clinical Alfaxalone treated subjects scored better than propofol and sevoflurane anaesthetised patients in the cognition tests: (MMSE p = 0.0251; Grooved Pegboard test dominant hand pre v post anaesthesia scores p = 0.8438 for alfaxalone and p = 0.0156 for propofol and propofol/sevoflurane combined). The higher cognition scores were accompanied by higher serum m-BDNF levels in the alfaxalone anaesthetised patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that sedation and anaesthesia induced by the synthetic neuroactive steroid alfaxalone may be accompanied by effects normally caused by physiological actions of allopregnanolone at PXR, namely, increased secretion of m-BDNF and consequent neuroprotection and preservation of cognition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was registered on 17/01/2018 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: registration number ACTRN12618000064202 [Universal Trial Number U1111-1198-0412].

Application of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion for Optimized Hemodynamic Status in ESRD Patients Receiving Arteriovenous Access Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objectives: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased anesthetic risks such as cardiovascular events resulting in higher perioperative mortality rates. This study investigated the perioperative and postoperative outcomes in ESRD patients receiving propofol target-controlled infusion with brachial plexus block during arteriovenous (AV) access surgery. Materials and Methods: We recruited fifty consecutive patients scheduled to receive AV access surgery. While all patients received general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block, the patients were randomly assigned to one of two general anesthesia maintenance groups, with 23 receiving propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) and 24 receiving sevoflurane inhalation. We measured perioperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and cardiac output and recorded postoperative pain status and adverse events in both groups. Results: ESRD patients receiving propofol TCI had significantly less reduction in blood pressure than those receiving sevoflurane inhalation (p < 0.05) during AV access surgery. Perioperative cardiac output and heart rate were similar in both groups. Both groups reported relatively low postoperative pain score and a low incidence of adverse events. Conclusions: Propofol TCI with brachial plexus block can be used as an effective anesthesia regimen for ESRD patients receiving AV access surgery. It can be used with less blood pressure fluctuation than inhalational anesthesia.

The effects of total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia maintenance on tissue oxygenation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia techniques on tissue oxygenation in cardiac surgery. We compared the effects of midazolam-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based (SEVO) inhalation anesthesia maintenance on intraoperative central and regional tissue oxygenation parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 adult patients who were scheduled for elective isolated coronary bypass surgery were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups: the TIVA group consisted of total intravenous anesthesia maintenance patients (n=52) and the SEVO group consisted of patients with inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane maintenance (n=52). Tissue oxygenation values were observed with left-right cerebral and somatic left forearm Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) sensors. The hemodynamic parameters, NIRS StO2, central (ScvO2) and peripheral venous oxygen saturations of the patients were recorded at six intraoperative time points. RESULTS: The effects of midazolam-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia maintenance on intraoperative central and peripheral tissue oxygenation parameters were compared and it was found that in the left forearm NIRS StO2 and ScvO2 values were higher in the SEVO group than the TIVA group. Although not significantly different, forearm regional venous oxygen saturation was also higher in the SEVO group. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of anesthetic drugs on regional tissue oxygenation can become important in critical patients and challenging surgeries. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia provides better tissue oxygenation than TIVA in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.

Effect of Different General Anesthesia Methods on the Prognosis of Patients with Breast Cancer after Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia (IA) on the prognosis of breast cancer patients has been controversial. The study is aimed at exploring the effects of different anesthesia methods on the postoperative prognosis of breast cancer patients. Methods: Literature retrieval was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. The literature topic was to compare the effects of TIVA and IA on the prognosis of patients undergoing breast cancer resection. Two researchers extracted data from the literature independently. This study included randomized controlled trials that evaluated for risk of bias according to the "Risk assessment Tool for Bias in Randomized Trials" in the Cochrane Manual. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias in observational studies. The chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. If heterogeneity existed between literature, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding low-quality and different-effect models. Data were statistically analyzed using the Cochrane software RevMan 5.3. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for statistical description. Results: Seven literatures were selected for meta-analysis. There were 9781 patients, 3736 (38.20%) receiving TIVA and 6045 (61.80%) receiving inhalation anesthesia. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between TIVA and IA breast cancer patients (HR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.91, 1.22), Z = 0.70, P = 0.49). There was no difference in the literature (χ 2 = 6.82, P = 0.34, I 2 = 12%), and there was no obvious publication bias. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between TIVA and IA patients (HR = 0.95, 95% CI (0.79, 1.13), Z = 0.61, P = 0.54). There was no heterogeneity in the literature (χ 2 = 5.23, P = 0.52, I 2 = 0%), and there was no significant publication bias. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in OS and RFS between TIVA and IA patients during breast cancer resection. The prognostic effects of TIVA and IA were similar.

The effect of different flow levels and concentrations of sevoflurane during the wash-in phase on volatile agent consumption: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The standard procedure for low-flow anesthesia usually incorporates a high fresh gas flow (FGF) of 4-6 L/minute during the wash-in phase. However, the administration of a high FGF (4-6 L/min) increases the inhaled anesthetic agent consumption. This study was designed to compare the sevoflurane consumption at 2 rates of flow and vaporizer concentration during the wash-in period. METHODS: Patients were randomly enrolled into high FGF (HFGF) (n = 30) and low FGF (LFGF) (n = 30) groups. During the wash-in, the HFGF group received 4 L/minute FGF with a sevoflurane vaporizer setting of 2.5%, and the LFGF group received 1 L/minute FGF with a vaporizer setting of 8%. Once the wash-in was complete, anesthesia maintenance was performed with 0.5 L/min FGF with a vaporizer setting of 2.5-4.5% in both groups. The patient demographic data, bispectral index values, hemodynamic variables, wash-in time, sevoflurane consumption during the wash-in phase, and total sevoflurane consumption were analyzed. RESULTS: The median sevoflurane consumption in the wash-in phase was 8.2 mL (7.1-9.3) in the HFGF group and 2.7 mL (2.2-3.1) in the LFGF group (p = 0.001). The mean total sevoflurane consumption was 17.41 ± 3.58 mL in the patients who received HFGF and 14.93 ± 3.57 mL in the LFGF group (p = 0.001). The mean wash-in completion time was 12.49 ± 2.79 min in the HFGF group and 3.35 ± 0.67 min in the LFGF group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The anesthetic agent consumption during the wash-in phase was approximately 3 times lower with the administration of sevoflurane at 1 L/minute FGF than the use of 4 L/minute FGF.

Prospective validation of gas man simulations of sevoflurane in O2/air over a wide fresh gas flow range.

The use of inhaled anesthetics has come under increased scrutiny because of their environmental effects. This has led to a shift where sevoflurane in O2/air has become the predominant gas mixture to maintain anesthesia. To further reduce environmental impact, lower fresh gas flows (FGF) should be used. An accurate model of sevoflurane consumption allows us to assess and quantify the impact of the effects of lowering FGFs. This study therefore tested the accuracy of the Gas Man® model by determining its ability to predict end-expired sevoflurane concentrations (FETsevo) in patients using a protocol spanning a wide range of FGF and vaporizer settings. After IRB approval, 28 ASA I-II patients undergoing a gynecologic or urologic procedure under general endotracheal anesthesia were enrolled. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in O2/air, delivered via a Zeus or FLOW-i workstation (14 patients each). Every fifteen min, FGF was changed to randomly selected values ranging from 0.2 to 6 L/min while the sevoflurane vaporizer setting was left at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. The FETsevo was collected every min for 1 h. For each patient, a Gas Man® simulation was run using patient weight and the same FGF, vaporizer and minute ventilation settings used during the procedure. For cardiac output, the Gas Man default setting was used (= Brody formula). Gas Man®'s performance was assessed by comparing measured with Gas Man® predicted FETsevo using linear regression and Varvel's criteria [median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE), and divergence]. Additional analysis included separating performance for the wash-in (0-15 min) and maintenance phase (15-60 min). For the FLOW-i, MDPE, MDAPE and divergence were 1% [- 6, 8], 7% [3, 15] and - 0.96%/h [- 1.14, - 0.88], respectively. During the first 15 min, MDPE and MDAPE were 18% [1, 51] and 21% [8, 51], respectively, and during the last 45 min 0% [- 7, 5] and 6% [2, 10], respectively. For the Zeus, MDPE, MDAPE and divergence were 0% [- 5, 8], 6% [3, 12] and - 0.57%/h [- 0.85, - 0.16], respectively. During the first 15 min, MDPE and MDAPE were 7% [- 6, 28] and 13% [6, 32], respectively, and during the last 45 min - 1% [- 5, 5] and 5% [2, 9], respectively. In conclusion, Gas Man® predicts FETsevo in O2/air in adults over a wide range of FGF and vaporizer settings using different workstations with both MDPE and MDAPE < 10% during the first hour of anesthesia, with better relative performance for simulating maintenance than wash-in. In the authors' opinion, this degree of performance suffices for Gas Man® to be used to quantify the environmental impact of FGF reduction in real life practice of the wash-in and maintenance period combined.

Minimizing sevoflurane wastage by sensible use of automated gas control technology in the flow-i workstation: an economic and ecological assessment.

Both ecological and economic considerations dictate minimising wastage of volatile anaesthetics. To reconcile apparent opposing stakes between ecological/economical concerns and stability of anaesthetic delivery, new workstations feature automated software that continually optimizes the FGF to reliably obtain the requested gas mixture with minimal volatile anaesthetic waste. The aim of this study is to analyse the kinetics and consumption pattern of different approaches of sevoflurane delivery with the same 2% end-tidal goal in all patients. The consumption patterns of sevoflurane of a Flow-i were retrospectively studied in cases with a target end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (Etsevo) of 2%. For each setting, 25 cases were included in the analysis. In Automatic Gas Control (AGC) regulation with software version V4.04, a speed setting 6 was observed; in AGC software version V4.07, speed settings 2, 4, 6 and 8 were observed, as well as a group where a minimal FGF was manually pursued and a group with a fixed 2 L/min FGF. In 45 min, an average of 14.5 mL was consumed in the 2L-FGF group, 5.0 mL in the minimal-manual group, 7.1 mL in the AGC4.04 group and 6.3 mL in the AGC4.07 group. Faster speed AGC-settings resulted in higher consumption, from 6.0 mL in speed 2 to 7.3 mL in speed 8. The Etsevo target was acquired fastest in the 2L-FGF group and the Etsevo was more stable in the AGC groups and the 2L-FGF groups. In all AGC groups, the consumption in the first 8 min was significantly higher than in the minimal flow group, but then decreased to a comparable rate. The more recent AGC4.07 algorithm was more efficient than the older AGC4.04 algorithm. This study indicates that the AGC technology permits very significant economic and ecological benefits, combined with excellent stability and convenience, over conventional FGF settings and should be favoured. While manually regulated minimal flow is still slightly more economical compared to the automated algorithm, this comes with a cost of lower precision of the Etsevo. Further optimization of the AGC algorithms, particularly in the early wash-in period seems feasible. In AGC mode, lower speed settings result in significantly lower consumption of sevoflurane. Routine clinical practice using what historically is called "low flow anaesthesia" (e.g. 2 L/min FGF) should be abandoned, and all anaesthesia machines should be upgraded as soon as possible with automatic delivery technology to minimize atmospheric pollution with volatile anaesthetics.

Transplantation of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes into a Myocardial Infarction Model of Cynomolgus Monkey.

Recent evidence has provided exciting proof of concepts for the use of pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (PSC-CMs) for cardiac repair; however, large animal studies, which better reflect human disease, are required for clinical application. Here, we describe how to create myocardial infarction in cynomolgus monkey followed by transplantation of PSC-CMs. This method ensures the establishment of a myocardial infarction model and enables reliable PSC-CM transplantation.

Inhaled anesthesia in neurosurgery: Still a role?

In patients undergoing craniotomy, general anesthesia should be addressed to warrant good hypnosis, immobility, and analgesia, to ensure systemic and cerebral physiological status and provide the best possible surgical field. Regarding craniotomies, it is unclear if there are substantial differences in providing general anesthesia using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or balanced anesthesia (BA) accomplished using the third generation halogenates. New evidence highlighted that the last generation of halogenated agents has possible advantages compared with intravenous drugs: rapid induction, minimal absorption and metabolization, reproducible pharmacokinetic, faster recovery, cardioprotective effect, and opioid spare analgesia. This review aims to report evidence related to the use of the latest halogenated agents in patients undergoing craniotomy and to present available clinical evidence on their effects: cerebral and systemic hemodynamic, neurophysiological monitoring, and timing and quality of recovery after anesthesia.

In vivo characterization of anti-atrial fibrillatory potential and pharmacological safety profile of INa,L plus IKr inhibitor ranolazine using the halothane-anesthetized dogs.

To characterize in vivo anti-atrial fibrillatory potential and pharmacological safety profile of ranolazine having INa,L plus IKr inhibitory actions in comparison with those of clinically available anti-atrial fibrillatory drugs; namely, dronedarone, amiodarone, bepridil and dl-sotalol in our previous studies, ranolazine dihydrochloride in sub-therapeutic (0.3 mg/kg) and supra-therapeutic (3 mg/kg) doses was intravenously infused over 10 min to the halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 5). The low dose increased the heart rate, cardiac output and atrioventricular conduction velocity possibly via vasodilator action-induced, reflex-mediated increase of adrenergic tone. Meanwhile, the high dose decreased the heart rate, ventricular contraction, cardiac output and mean blood pressure, indicating that drug-induced direct actions may exceed the reflex-mediated compensation. In addition, it prolonged the atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods, of which potency and selectivity for the former were less great compared with those of the clinically-available drugs. Moreover, it did not alter the ventricular early repolarization period in vivo, but prolonged the late repolarization with minimal risk for re-entrant arrhythmias. These in vivo findings of ranolazine suggest that INa,L suppression may attenuate IKr inhibition-associated prolongation of early repolarization in the presence of reflex-mediated increase of adrenergic tone. Thus, ranolazine alone may be less promising as an anti-atrial fibrillatory drug, but its potential risk for inducing torsade de pointes will be small. These information can be used as a guide to predict the utility and adverse effects of anti-atrial fibrillatory drugs having multi-channel modulatory action.

Nitrous oxide improves cardiovascular, respiratory, and thermal stability during prolonged isoflurane anesthesia in juvenile guinea pigs.

Anesthesia is frequently used to facilitate physiological monitoring during interventional animal studies. However, its use may induce cardiovascular (central and peripheral), respiratory, and thermoregulatory depression, confounding results in anesthetized animals. Despite the wide utility of guinea pigs as a translational platform, anesthetic protocols remain unstandardized for extended physiological studies in this species. Therefore, optimizing an anesthetic protocol that balances stable anesthesia with intact cardiorespiratory and metabolic function is crucial. To achieve this, 12 age and sex-matched juvenile Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs underwent extended anesthesia (≤150 min) with either (a) isoflurane (ISO: 1.5%), or (b) isoflurane + N2 O (ISO+ N2 O: 0.8% +70%), in this randomized cross-over designed study. Cardiovascular (HR, SBP, peripheral microvascular blood flow), respiratory (respiratory rate, SpO2 ), and thermal (Tre and Tsk ) measures were recorded continuously throughout anesthesia. Blood gas measures pre- and post- anesthesia were performed. Incorporation of 70% N2 O allowed for significant reductions in isoflurane (to 0.8%) while maintaining an effective anesthetic depth for prolonged noninvasive physiological examination in guinea pigs. ISO+N2 O maintained heart rate, peripheral blood flow, respiratory rate, and thermoregulatory function at levels closest to those of conscious animals, especially in females; however, it did not fully rescue anesthesia-induced hypotension. These results suggest that for studies requiring prolonged physiological examination (≤150 min) in guinea pigs, 0.8% isoflurane with a 70% N2 O adjuvant provides adequate anesthesia, while minimizing associated cardiorespiratory depression. The preservation of cardiorespiratory status is most marked throughout the first hour of anesthesia.

Volatile anaesthesia and peri-operative outcomes related to cancer: a feasibility and pilot study for a large randomised control trial.

Published data suggest that the type of general anaesthesia used during surgical resection for cancer may impact on patient long-term outcome. However, robust prospective clinical evidence is essential to guide a change in clinical practice. We explored the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to investigate the impact of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol vs. inhalational volatile anaesthesia on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing major cancer surgery. We undertook a randomised, double-blind feasibility and pilot study of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia or volatile-based maintenance anaesthesia during cancer resection surgery at three tertiary hospitals in Australia and the USA. Patients were randomly allocated to receive propofol total intravenous anaesthesia or volatile-based maintenance anaesthesia. Primary outcomes for this study were successful recruitment to the study and successful delivery of the assigned anaesthetic treatment as per randomisation arm. Of the 217 eligible patients approached, 146 were recruited, a recruitment rate of 67.3% (95%CI 60.6-73.5%). One hundred and forty-five patients adhered to the randomised treatment arm, 99.3% (95%CI 96.2-100%). Intra-operative patient characteristics and postoperative complications were comparable between the two intervention groups. This feasibility and pilot study supports the viability of the protocol for a large, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of anaesthesia technique on postoperative cancer outcomes. The volatile anaesthesia and peri-operative outcomes related to cancer (VAPOR-C) study that is planned to follow this feasibility study is an international, multicentre trial with the aim of providing evidence-based guidelines for the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing major cancer surgery.

Effect of volatile and total intravenous anesthesia on syndecan-1 shedding after minimally invasive gastrectomy: a randomized trial.

This study aimed to compare the effects of volatile anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on syndecan-1 shedding in patients with gastric cancer undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to either the Volatile (n = 68) or the TIVA (n = 68) group. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane/remifentanil or propofol/remifentanil in the Volatile and TIVA groups, respectively. Serum syndecan-1 was evaluated at pre-operation, end of operation, and postoperative day (POD) 1. Inflammatory markers including white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were also measured at pre-operation, end of operation, and POD 1, 2, 3, and 5. The TIVA group showed significantly lower levels of syndecan-1 at the end of the operation compared to the Volatile group; however, no difference was seen between the groups at POD 1. The WBC count and NLR were significantly lower in the TIVA group at the end of the operation than the Volatile group, but there were no differences between the groups at POD 1, 2, 3, and 5. CRP levels were similar between the groups at all time points. In conclusion, despite TIVA being superior to volatile anesthesia in protecting endothelial glycocalyx during the operation, both did not prevent postoperative syndecan-1 shedding after gastrectomy.Clinical trial registration number: NCT04183296 (ClinicalTrial.gov, 03/12/2019).